The
Academic Word List
[AWL] (Coxhead, 2000) has been very useful for teachers and
learners since it was released in 2000. Nevertheless, we believe
that the new academic vocabulary lists that are available here are more
accurate and useful, in at least four important ways. The following
is a short summary of the discussion from our 2013 article in
Applied Linguistics.
First, the AWL based on an older, much smaller corpus --
just 3.5 million words of academic texts from the 1990s. Ours is
based on more than 120 million words of academic texts in the
Corpus
of Contemporary American English, which contains texts as recent
as 2015.
Our academic corpus is composed all 86 million
words of academic journals in COCA, as well as 26 million words from
academically-oriented magazine articles. The following table shows
the size of the different sub-genres, with the number of words in millions is shown in
parenthesis:
History (14.3 million words) |
Education (8.5) |
Law and political science (12.5) |
Social Science (16.7) |
Humanities (11.1) |
Philosophy, religion, psychology
(12.5) |
Science and technology (22.8) |
Medicine and health (9.7) |
Business and finance (12.8) |
Second, our word lists provide
better coverage of academic English. The 570 "word families"
in the AWL cover 7.2% of the words in the COCA academic texts, but
the top 570 word families in our list cover 14.0% -- nearly twice as
much. In a "neutral" corpus -- the 32 million words of academic and
semi-academic
texts in the British
National Corpus -- the AWL covers 7.1% and our list covers 14.0%
-- again nearly twice as much. Part of this difference is due to the
fact that the AWL "sits on top of" the General Service List (GSL),
which already has many high-frequency words, but there are other
factors at play as well.
Our academic list is also very much
oriented towards just academic, compared to other genres. For
example, it covers 14.0% of academic texts in COCA, 7.3% of the 85
million words of newspapers in COCA, and just 3.4% of the 86 million
words of fiction texts in COCA. That's exactly what you'd want -- a
list that is oriented mainly towards academic, rather than a
general
word list for all types of English.
Third, we believe that our lists
are more usable -- they provide the data in a number of
different formats (not just "one size fits all" word families),
which are oriented towards different needs. You can
download the data for the 3,000 "general
academic" words (sample),
the words grouped into AWL-like "word families" (sample),
and the top 20,000 words in COCA Academic overall (sample).
We also provide a wealth of
information in the word families, which is not available in the
standard AWL families (see a
sample of our
lists):
-
The words are grouped by lemma (e.g. [decide]
= {decide, decided, deciding}, etc), which eliminates clutter.
(For example, most people don't really need to see two separate entries for
decide and decides).
-
There
are different entries by part of speech, so you know, for example,
whether abstract is used more as a noun, verb, or adjective.
-
The words are also color-coded to let you know whether the word is a
"general" academic word, or whether it is a more "technical" one
that occurs in just a few sub-genres.
-
And most importantly, the
entries are listed in order of frequency, to help you focus more on
words that you will actually see in the real world -- rather than
just having a mass of unorganized words, as with the traditional AWL
word families.
Fourth, our word lists are integrally
tied into the COCA
corpus, so that you can see
a great deal of
information about the meaning and usage of each word -- its definition, the frequency
in each of the nine academic sub-genres (e.g. Medicine,
Science, or Business), the collocates (nearby words, which
provide great insight into meaning and usage), and many
re-sortable concordance lines for each word, which show the
patterns in which the word occurs. The regular AWL lists are
integrated into the Compleat
LexTutor site, but not to the same degree that ours are with
COCA.
|